On the Detection of False Information: From Rumors to Fake News

Tesis por compendio[ES] En tiempos recientes, el desarrollo de las redes sociales y de las agencias de noticias han traído nuevos retos y amenazas a la web. Estas amenazas han llamado la atención de la comunidad investigadora en Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural (PLN) ya que están contaminando las plataformas de redes sociales. Un ejemplo de amenaza serían las noticias falsas, en las que los usuarios difunden y comparten información falsa, inexacta o engañosa. La información falsa no se limita a la información verificable, sino que también incluye información que se utiliza con fines nocivos. Además, uno de los desafíos a los que se enfrentan los investigadores es la gran cantidad de usuarios en las plataformas de redes sociales, donde detectar a los difusores de información falsa no es tarea fácil. Los trabajos previos que se han propuesto para limitar o estudiar el tema de la detección de información falsa se han centrado en comprender el lenguaje de la información falsa desde una perspectiva lingüística. En el caso de información verificable, estos enfoques se han propuesto en un entorno monolingüe. Además, apenas se ha investigado la detección de las fuentes o los difusores de información falsa en las redes sociales. En esta tesis estudiamos la información falsa desde varias perspectivas. En primer lugar, dado que los trabajos anteriores se centraron en el estudio de la información falsa en un entorno monolingüe, en esta tesis estudiamos la información falsa en un entorno multilingüe. Proponemos diferentes enfoques multilingües y los comparamos con un conjunto de baselines monolingües. Además, proporcionamos estudios sistemáticos para los resultados de la evaluación de nuestros enfoques para una mejor comprensión. En segundo lugar, hemos notado que el papel de la información afectiva no se ha investigado en profundidad. Por lo tanto, la segunda parte de nuestro trabajo de investigación estudia el papel de la información afectiva en la información falsa y muestra cómo los autores de contenido falso la emplean para manipular al lector. Aquí, investigamos varios tipos de información falsa para comprender la correlación entre la información afectiva y cada tipo (Propaganda, Trucos / Engaños, Clickbait y Sátira). Por último, aunque no menos importante, en un intento de limitar su propagación, también abordamos el problema de los difusores de información falsa en las redes sociales. En esta dirección de la investigación, nos enfocamos en explotar varias características basadas en texto extraídas de los mensajes de perfiles en línea de tales difusores. Estudiamos diferentes conjuntos de características que pueden tener el potencial de ayudar a discriminar entre difusores de información falsa y verificadores de hechos.[CA] En temps recents, el desenvolupament de les xarxes socials i de les agències de notícies han portat nous reptes i amenaces a la web. Aquestes amenaces han cridat l'atenció de la comunitat investigadora en Processament de Llenguatge Natural (PLN) ja que estan contaminant les plataformes de xarxes socials. Un exemple d'amenaça serien les notícies falses, en què els usuaris difonen i comparteixen informació falsa, inexacta o enganyosa. La informació falsa no es limita a la informació verificable, sinó que també inclou informació que s'utilitza amb fins nocius. A més, un dels desafiaments als quals s'enfronten els investigadors és la gran quantitat d'usuaris en les plataformes de xarxes socials, on detectar els difusors d'informació falsa no és tasca fàcil. Els treballs previs que s'han proposat per limitar o estudiar el tema de la detecció d'informació falsa s'han centrat en comprendre el llenguatge de la informació falsa des d'una perspectiva lingüística. En el cas d'informació verificable, aquests enfocaments s'han proposat en un entorn monolingüe. A més, gairebé no s'ha investigat la detecció de les fonts o els difusors d'informació falsa a les xarxes socials. En aquesta tesi estudiem la informació falsa des de diverses perspectives. En primer lloc, atès que els treballs anteriors es van centrar en l'estudi de la informació falsa en un entorn monolingüe, en aquesta tesi estudiem la informació falsa en un entorn multilingüe. Proposem diferents enfocaments multilingües i els comparem amb un conjunt de baselines monolingües. A més, proporcionem estudis sistemàtics per als resultats de l'avaluació dels nostres enfocaments per a una millor comprensió. En segon lloc, hem notat que el paper de la informació afectiva no s'ha investigat en profunditat. Per tant, la segona part del nostre treball de recerca estudia el paper de la informació afectiva en la informació falsa i mostra com els autors de contingut fals l'empren per manipular el lector. Aquí, investiguem diversos tipus d'informació falsa per comprendre la correlació entre la informació afectiva i cada tipus (Propaganda, Trucs / Enganys, Clickbait i Sàtira). Finalment, però no menys important, en un intent de limitar la seva propagació, també abordem el problema dels difusors d'informació falsa a les xarxes socials. En aquesta direcció de la investigació, ens enfoquem en explotar diverses característiques basades en text extretes dels missatges de perfils en línia de tals difusors. Estudiem diferents conjunts de característiques que poden tenir el potencial d'ajudar a discriminar entre difusors d'informació falsa i verificadors de fets.[EN] In the recent years, the development of social media and online news agencies has brought several challenges and threats to the Web. These threats have taken the attention of the Natural Language Processing (NLP) research community as they are polluting the online social media platforms. One of the examples of these threats is false information, in which false, inaccurate, or deceptive information is spread and shared by online users. False information is not limited to verifiable information, but it also involves information that is used for harmful purposes. Also, one of the challenges that researchers have to face is the massive number of users in social media platforms, where detecting false information spreaders is not an easy job. Previous work that has been proposed for limiting or studying the issue of detecting false information has focused on understanding the language of false information from a linguistic perspective. In the case of verifiable information, approaches have been proposed in a monolingual setting. Moreover, detecting the sources or the spreaders of false information in social media has not been investigated much. In this thesis we study false information from several aspects. First, since previous work focused on studying false information in a monolingual setting, in this thesis we study false information in a cross-lingual one. We propose different cross-lingual approaches and we compare them to a set of monolingual baselines. Also, we provide systematic studies for the evaluation results of our approaches for better understanding. Second, we noticed that the role of affective information was not investigated in depth. Therefore, the second part of our research work studies the role of the affective information in false information and shows how the authors of false content use it to manipulate the reader. Here, we investigate several types of false information to understand the correlation between affective information and each type (Propaganda, Hoax, Clickbait, Rumor, and Satire). Last but not least, in an attempt to limit its spread, we also address the problem of detecting false information spreaders in social media. In this research direction, we focus on exploiting several text-based features extracted from the online profile messages of those spreaders. We study different feature sets that can have the potential to help to identify false information spreaders from fact checkers.Ghanem, BHH. (2020). On the Detection of False Information: From Rumors to Fake News [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/158570TESISCompendi

An Emotional Analysis of False Information in Social Media and News Articles

[EN] Fake news is risky since it has been created to manipulate the readers' opinions and beliefs. In this work, we compared the language of false news to the real one of real news from an emotional perspective, considering a set of false information types (propaganda, hoax, clickbait, and satire) from social media and online news articles sources. Our experiments showed that false information has different emotional patterns in each of its types, and emotions play a key role in deceiving the reader. Based on that, we proposed a LSTM neural network model that is emotionally-infused to detect false news.The work of the second author was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research project MISMISFAKEnHATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKEnews and HATE speech (PGC2018-096212B-C31).Ghanem, BHH.; Rosso, P.; Rangel, F. (2020). An Emotional Analysis of False Information in Social Media and News Articles. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 20(2):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381750S118202Magda B. Arnold. 1960. Emotion and Personality. Columbia University Press. Magda B. Arnold. 1960. Emotion and Personality. Columbia University Press.Bhatt, G., Sharma, A., Sharma, S., Nagpal, A., Raman, B., & Mittal, A. (2018). Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Stance Identification. Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW ’18. doi:10.1145/3184558.3191577Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on twitter. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web - WWW ’11. doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500Chakraborty, A., Paranjape, B., Kakarla, S., & Ganguly, N. (2016). Stop Clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). doi:10.1109/asonam.2016.7752207Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200. doi:10.1080/02699939208411068Ghanem, B., Rosso, P., & Rangel, F. (2018). Stance Detection in Fake News A Combined Feature Representation. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER). doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5510Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Karadzhov, G., Nakov, P., Màrquez, L., Barrón-Cedeño, A., … Koychev, I. (2017). Fully Automated Fact Checking Using External Sources. RANLP 2017 - Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing Meet Deep Learning. doi:10.26615/978-954-452-049-6_046Kumar, S., West, R., & Leskovec, J. (2016). Disinformation on the Web. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. doi:10.1145/2872427.2883085Li, X., Meng, W., & Yu, C. (2011). T-verifier: Verifying truthfulness of fact statements. 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering. doi:10.1109/icde.2011.5767859Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2Plutchik, R. (2001). The Nature of Emotions. American Scientist, 89(4), 344. doi:10.1511/2001.4.344Popat, K., Mukherjee, S., Strötgen, J., & Weikum, G. (2016). Credibility Assessment of Textual Claims on the Web. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. doi:10.1145/2983323.2983661Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N., Das, D., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-Based Opinion Mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 31-38. doi:10.1109/mis.2013.4Rangel, F., & Rosso, P. (2016). On the impact of emotions on author profiling. Information Processing & Management, 52(1), 73-92. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.06.003Rashkin, H., Choi, E., Jang, J. Y., Volkova, S., & Choi, Y. (2017). Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1317Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., & Liu, Y. (2017). CSI. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. doi:10.1145/3132847.3132877Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676Volkova, S., Shaffer, K., Jang, J. Y., & Hodas, N. (2017). Separating Facts from Fiction: Linguistic Models to Classify Suspicious and Trusted News Posts on Twitter. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2102Zhao, Z., Resnick, P., & Mei, Q. (2015). Enquiring Minds. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. doi:10.1145/2736277.274163

FacTweet: Profiling Fake News Twitter Accounts

[EN] We present an approach to detect fake news in Twitter at the account level using a neural recurrent model and a variety of different semantic and stylistic features. Our method extracts a set of features from the timelines of news Twitter accounts by reading their posts as chunks, rather than dealing with each tweet independently. We show the experimental benefits of modeling latent stylistic signatures of mixed fake and real news with a sequential model over a wide range of strong baselinesThe work of Paolo Rosso was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research project MISMIS-FAKEnHATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKE news and HATE speech (PGC2018-096212-B-C31)Ghanem, BHH.; Ponzetto, SP.; Rosso, P. (2020). FacTweet: Profiling Fake News Twitter Accounts. Springer. 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59430-5_3S3545Aker, A., Kevin, V., Bontcheva, K.: Credibility and transparency of news sources: data collection and feature analysis. arXiv (2019)Aker, A., Kevin, V., Bontcheva, K.: Predicting news source credibility. arXiv (2019)Badawy, A., Lerman, K., Ferrara, E.: Who falls for online political manipulation? In: Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 162–168. ACM (2019)Baly, R., Karadzhov, G., Alexandrov, D., Glass, J., Nakov, P.: Predicting factuality of reporting and bias of news media sources. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 3528–3539 (2018)Baly, R., Karadzhov, G., Saleh, A., Glass, J., Nakov, P.: Multi-task ordinal regression for jointly predicting the trustworthiness and the leading political ideology of news media. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 2109–2116 (2019)Boyd, R.L., et al.: Characterizing the Internet Research Agency’s Social Media Operations During the 2016 US Presidential Election using Linguistic Analyses. PsyArXiv (2018)Choi, Y., Wiebe, J.: +/-EffectWordNet: sense-level lexicon acquisition for opinion inference. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1181–1191 (2014)Clark, E.M., Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A., Galbraith, R.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Sifting robotic from organic text: a natural language approach for detecting automation on Twitter. J. Comput. Sci. 16, 1–7 (2016)Davis, C.A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: BotOrNot: a system to evaluate social bots. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 273–274. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016)Dhingra, B., Zhou, Z., Fitzpatrick, D., Muehl, M., Cohen, W.W.: Tweet2Vec: character-based distributed representations for social media. In: The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), p. 269 (2016)Dickerson, J.P., Kagan, V., Subrahmanian, V.: Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: are humans more opinionated than bots? In: 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2014), pp. 620–627. IEEE (2014)Ghanem, B., Buscaldi, D., Rosso, P.: TexTrolls: identifying Russian trolls on Twitter from a textual perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01340 (2019)Ghanem, B., Cignarella, A.T., Bosco, C., Rosso, P., Rangel, F.: UPV-28-UNITO at SemEval-2019 Task 7: exploiting post’s nesting and syntax information for rumor stance classification. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval), pp. 1125–1131 (2019)Ghanem, B., Glavas, G., Giachanou, A., Ponzetto, S.P., Rosso, P., Pardo, F.M.R.: UPV-UMA at CheckThat! Lab: verifying Arabic claims using a cross lingual approach. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2019 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum, Lugano, Switzerland, 9–12 September 2019 (2019)Ghanem, B., Rosso, P., Rangel, F.: An emotional analysis of false information in social media and news articles. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 20(2), 1–18 (2020)Giachanou, A., Rosso, P., Crestani, F.: Leveraging emotional signals for credibility detection. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 877–880 (2019)Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B.A.: Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96(5), 1029 (2009)Im, J., et al.: Still out there: modeling and identifying Russian troll accounts on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11162 (2019)Karduni, A., et al.: Can you verifi this? Studying uncertainty and decision-making about misinformation using visual analytics. In: Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (2018)Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pp. 26–34 (2010)Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Varol, O., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: The spread of fake news by social bots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07592, pp. 96–104 (2017)Volkova, S., Shaffer, K., Jang, J.Y., Hodas, N.: Separating facts from fiction: linguistic models to classify suspicious and trusted news posts on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (Volume 2: Short Papers), vol. 2, pp. 647–653 (2017)Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2005

Overview of the 8th Author Profiling Task at PAN 2020: Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter

[EN] This overview presents the Author Profiling shared task at PAN 2020. The focus of this year's task is on determining whether or not the author of a Twitter feed is keen to spread fake news. Two have been the main aims: (i) to show the feasibility of automatically identifying potential fake news spreaders in Twitter; and (ii) to show the difficulty of identifying them when they do not limit themselves to just retweet domain-specific news. For this purpose a corpus with Twitter data has been provided, covering the English and Spanish languages. Altogether, the approaches of 66 participants have been evaluated.First of all we thank the participants: 66 this year, record in terms of participants at PAN Lab since 2009! We have to thank also Martin Potthast, Matti Wiegmann, and Nikolay Kolyada to help with the 66 Virtual Machines in the TIRA platform. We thank Symanto for sponsoring the ex aequo award for the two best performing systems at the author profiling shared task of this year. The work of Paolo Rosso was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research project MISMIS-FAKEnHATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKE news and HATE speech (PGC2018-096212-B-C31). The work of Anastasia Giachanou is supported by the SNSF Early Postdoc Mobility grant under the project Early Fake News Detection on Social Media, Switzerland (P2TIP2 181441).Rangel, F.; Giachanou, A.; Ghanem, BHH.; Rosso, P. (2020). Overview of the 8th Author Profiling Task at PAN 2020: Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2696:1-18. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166528S118269

The Impact of Psycholinguistic Patterns in Discriminating between Fake News Spreaders and Fact Checkers

[EN] Fake news is a threat to society. A huge amount of fake news is posted every day on social networks which is read, believed and sometimes shared by a number of users. On the other hand, with the aim to raise awareness, some users share posts that debunk fake news by using information from fact-checking websites. In this paper, we are interested in exploring the role of various psycholinguistic characteristics in differentiating between users that tend to share fake news and users that tend to debunk them. Psycholinguistic characteristics represent the different linguistic information that can be used to profile users and can be extracted or inferred from users¿ posts. We present the CheckerOrSpreader model that uses a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to differentiate between spreaders and checkers of fake news. The experimental results showed that CheckerOrSpreader is effective in classifying a user as a potential spreader or checker. Our analysis showed that checkers tend to use more positive language and a higher number of terms that show causality compared to spreaders who tend to use a higher amount of informal language, including slang and swear words.The works of Anastasia Giachanou and Daniel Oberski were funded by the Dutch Research Council (grant VI.Vidi.195.152). The work of Paolo Rosso was in the framework of the XAI-DisInfodemics project on eXplainable AI for disinformation and conspiracy detection during infodemics (PLEC2021-007681), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, as well as IBERIFIER, the Iberian Digital Media Research and Fact-Checking Hub funded by the European Digital Media Observatory (2020-EU-IA0252).Giachanou, A.; Ghanem, BHH.; Rissola, EA.; Rosso, P.; Crestani, F.; Oberski, D. (2022). The Impact of Psycholinguistic Patterns in Discriminating between Fake News Spreaders and Fact Checkers. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 138:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.10196011513

Overview of PAN 2020: Authorship Verification, Celebrity Profiling, Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter, and Style Change Detection

[EN] We briefly report on the four shared tasks organized as part of the PAN 2020 evaluation lab on digital text forensics and authorship analysis. Each tasks is introduced, motivated, and the results obtained are presented. Altogether, the four tasks attracted 230 registrations, yielding 83 successful submissions. This, and the fact that we continue to invite the submissions of software rather than its run output using the TIRA experimentation platform, marks for a good start into the second decade of PAN evaluations labs.We thank Symanto for sponsoring the ex aequo award for the two best performing systems at the author profiling shared task of this year on Profiling fake news spreaders on Twitter. The work of Paolo Rosso was partially funded by the Spanish MICINN under the research project MISMIS-FAKEnHATE on Misinformation and Miscommunication in social media: FAKE news and HATE speech (PGC2018¿096212-B-C31). The work of Anastasia Giachanou is supported by the SNSF Early Postdoc Mobility grant under the project Early Fake News Detection on Social Media, Switzerland (P2TIP2_181441).Bevendorff, J.; Ghanem, BHH.; Giachanou, A.; Kestemont, M.; Manjavacas, E.; Markov, I.; Mayerl, M.... (2020). Overview of PAN 2020: Authorship Verification, Celebrity Profiling, Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter, and Style Change Detection. Springer. 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_25S372383Bevendorff, J., et al.: Shared tasks on authorship analysis at PAN 2020. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2020. LNCS, vol. 12036, pp. 508–516. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_66Bevendorff, J., Stein, B., Hagen, M., Potthast, M.: Bias analysis and mitigation in the evaluation of authorship verification. In: 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 6301–6306 (2019)Bevendorff, J., Stein, B., Hagen, M., Potthast, M.: Generalizing unmasking for short texts. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT, pp. 654–659 (2019)Ghanem, B., Rosso, P., Rangel, F.: An emotional analysis of false information in social media and news articles. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 20(2), 1–18 (2020)Giachanou, A., Ríssola, E.A., Ghanem, B., Crestani, F., Rosso, Paolo: The role of personality and linguistic patterns in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Horacek, H., Cimiano, P. (eds.) NLDB 2020. LNCS, vol. 12089, pp. 181–192. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51310-8_17Giachanou, A., Rosso, P., Crestani, F.: Leveraging emotional signals for credibility detection. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 877–880 (2019)Kestemont, M., Stamatatos, E., Manjavacas, E., Daelemans, W., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the cross-domain authorship attribution task at PAN 2019. In: Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2019 Evaluation Labs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2019)Kestemont, M., et al.: Overview of the author identification task at PAN-2018: cross-domain authorship attribution and style change detection. In: Working Notes Papers of the CLEF 2018 Evaluation Labs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2018)Peñas, A., Rodrigo, A.: A simple measure to assess non-response. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2011)Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)Rangel, F., Giachanou, A., Ghanem, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 8th author profiling task at PAN 2020: profiling fake news spreaders on Twitter. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Rangel, F., Franco-Salvador, M., Rosso, P.: A low dimensionality representation for language variety identification. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2016. LNCS, vol. 9624, pp. 156–169. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75487-1_13Shu, K., Wang, S., Liu, H.: Understanding user profiles on social media for fake news detection. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), pp. 430–435 (2018)Vo, N., Lee, K.: Learning from fact-checkers: analysis and generation of fact-checking language. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2019)Noreen, E.W.: Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Hoboken (1989)Wiegmann, M., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the celebrity profiling task at PAN 2020. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Wiegmann, M., Stein, B., Potthast, M.: Celebrity profiling. In: 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2019). Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)Wiegmann, M., Stein, B., Potthast, M.: Overview of the celebrity profiling task at PAN 2019. In: CLEF 2019 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2019)Zangerle, E., Mayerl, M., Specht, G., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the style change detection task at PAN 2020. In: CLEF 2020 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2020)Zangerle, E., Tschuggnall, M., Specht, G., Potthast, M., Stein, B.: Overview of the style change detection task at PAN 2019. In: CLEF 2019 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers (2019

Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study

Summary Background Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years globally. Many gastrointestinal congenital anomalies are fatal without timely access to neonatal surgical care, but few studies have been done on these conditions in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared outcomes of the seven most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries globally, and identified factors associated with mortality. Methods We did a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of patients younger than 16 years, presenting to hospital for the first time with oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation, and Hirschsprung’s disease. Recruitment was of consecutive patients for a minimum of 1 month between October, 2018, and April, 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions, and outcomes using the REDCap platform. Patients were followed up for 30 days after primary intervention, or 30 days after admission if they did not receive an intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all conditions combined and each condition individually, stratified by country income status. We did a complete case analysis. Findings We included 3849 patients with 3975 study conditions (560 with oesophageal atresia, 448 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 681 with intestinal atresia, 453 with gastroschisis, 325 with exomphalos, 991 with anorectal malformation, and 517 with Hirschsprung’s disease) from 264 hospitals (89 in high-income countries, 166 in middleincome countries, and nine in low-income countries) in 74 countries. Of the 3849 patients, 2231 (58·0%) were male. Median gestational age at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 36–39) and median bodyweight at presentation was 2·8 kg (2·3–3·3). Mortality among all patients was 37 (39·8%) of 93 in low-income countries, 583 (20·4%) of 2860 in middle-income countries, and 50 (5·6%) of 896 in high-income countries (p<0·0001 between all country income groups). Gastroschisis had the greatest difference in mortality between country income strata (nine [90·0%] of ten in lowincome countries, 97 [31·9%] of 304 in middle-income countries, and two [1·4%] of 139 in high-income countries; p≤0·0001 between all country income groups). Factors significantly associated with higher mortality for all patients combined included country income status (low-income vs high-income countries, risk ratio 2·78 [95% CI 1·88–4·11], p<0·0001; middle-income vs high-income countries, 2·11 [1·59–2·79], p<0·0001), sepsis at presentation (1·20 [1·04–1·40], p=0·016), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at primary intervention (ASA 4–5 vs ASA 1–2, 1·82 [1·40–2·35], p<0·0001; ASA 3 vs ASA 1–2, 1·58, [1·30–1·92], p<0·0001]), surgical safety checklist not used (1·39 [1·02–1·90], p=0·035), and ventilation or parenteral nutrition unavailable when needed (ventilation 1·96, [1·41–2·71], p=0·0001; parenteral nutrition 1·35, [1·05–1·74], p=0·018). Administration of parenteral nutrition (0·61, [0·47–0·79], p=0·0002) and use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (0·65 [0·50–0·86], p=0·0024) or percutaneous central line (0·69 [0·48–1·00], p=0·049) were associated with lower mortality. Interpretation Unacceptable differences in mortality exist for gastrointestinal congenital anomalies between lowincome, middle-income, and high-income countries. Improving access to quality neonatal surgical care in LMICs will be vital to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 of ending preventable deaths in neonates and children younger than 5 years by 2030